EU AI Act Readiness Pack for SMEs | 17 Documents Plus Register Workbook
Law verified 11 September 2026 against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744
EU AI Act Readiness · For SME Deployers

Know exactly what
the AI Act asks of you,
and what it does not.

Most AI Act guidance is written for lawyers, or it is generic filler that overstates your duties to sell you something. This pack is 17 editable Word documents and an Excel register workbook, built for organisations that use AI tools built by others. Every item tells you whether it is law, good practice, or something you need to check.

Get the Readiness Pack
One-time payment · €249
Instant download
17
Editable Word documents
47
Checklist items, each sourced
1
Excel register workbook
6
Register sheets, ready to fill

What applies now, and what does not

Plenty of products imply every AI Act duty landed in August 2026. That is not accurate. Here is the actual position, which is also why preparing now is sensible rather than panicked.

2 Feb 2025
Prohibited practices under Article 5 and the original AI literacy duty under Article 4 apply.
In force
27 Jul 2026
The Digital Omnibus enters into force. The softened Article 4 AI literacy wording applies from this date.
In force
2 Aug 2026
Transparency obligations under Article 50 apply. Deployer duties sit in Article 50(3) and 50(4).
In force
2 Dec 2026
Machine-readable marking for older generative systems. New prohibitions on AI-generated non-consensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material.
Coming
2 Dec 2027
High-risk obligations for Annex III systems, including the deployer duties in Articles 26 and 27. This is the big one for recruitment, credit and education uses.
Coming
2 Aug 2028
High-risk obligations for AI inside Annex I products such as medical devices and machinery.
Coming

The real problem is not the deadline.
It is knowing which duties are actually yours.

Deployers have a narrower set of duties than providers. Most SME confusion comes from guidance that blurs the two, or from vendors who imply you carry obligations that are in fact theirs.

🎯

Provider duties keep getting sold to you

The chatbot disclosure duty in Article 50(1) is the provider's design duty. Your job is to check the disclosure is switched on, not to build it. Knowing the difference saves real money.

📏

Scope is misunderstood in both directions

Selling to EU customers is not, on its own, the test. The question is whether the output of the AI system is used in the EU. Some businesses assume they are out when they are in, and the reverse.

📋

Screening a tool is not classifying it

Risk tier depends on intended purpose, your role and the specific facts. A screening aid tells you what to do next. It is not a legal classification, and any product claiming otherwise is overselling.

🕑

The high-risk work takes time to start

Deployer duties for Annex III systems apply from December 2027, but the vendor information you need takes months to obtain. Starting the paperwork now is the point, not panic.

What is in the pack

Seventeen editable Word documents plus an Excel workbook of working registers. Every document carries its legal basis, who it applies to, whether it is law or good practice, and the date the law was last verified.

00

Start Here

Who the pack is for, what is inside, how to read the LAW, GOOD PRACTICE and CHECK labels, and the order to work through it.

Intro
01

Master Readiness Checklist for SME Deployers

47 items across seven sections. Every item cites its article or is marked as good practice, so you always know what is legally required and what is merely sensible.

Core
02

AI Tool Inventory and Screening Register

Four screening questions, four outcomes, and a full Annex III reference table showing what is covered and what is not. States plainly that screening is not legal classification.

Core
03

Company AI Usage Policy

Eleven sections covering scope, approved tools, prohibited uses, transparency and incident reporting. Marks clearly which rules go further than the Act requires.

Core
04

Staff AI Literacy Briefing Notes

A 15 to 20 minute briefing covering what the Act is, how it sorts AI uses, and six day-to-day staff responsibilities. Written to be read, not endured.

Training
05

Staff AI Literacy Training Register

Initial and refresher training records. Notes that you set your own frequency, because the Act does not prescribe a schedule.

Training
06

AI Transparency Notice Templates

Six versions: chatbot, deepfake, public-interest text, emotion recognition, voluntary business disclosure, and high-risk decision notice. Each states whether it is legally required or optional.

Transparency
07

Website AI Use Statement

Publishable page copy, with a clear note that a website statement never replaces a disclosure the law requires at the point of interaction.

Transparency
08

High-Risk AI Use Case Assessment Form

Six parts including a classification check, a deployer duties checklist mapped to each article, and a provider information tracker. Duties apply from December 2027; the form starts you now.

High-Risk
09

Human Oversight Procedure

Five oversight principles including guarding against over-reliance, an oversight register, and a six-step escalation route for when something goes wrong.

High-Risk
10

AI Incident Log

Includes the Article 3(49) definition of a serious incident and the correct reporting order: provider first, then importer or distributor, then market surveillance authorities.

Operations
11

Vendor AI Information Request Letter

A five-point written request grounded in the provider's Article 13 duty. Acknowledges that some documents will not exist until 2027 and asks for a date.

Vendor
12

AI Contract Clauses: Negotiation Language

Five clauses plus an indemnity in an appendix. States up front that none of these is a statutory requirement and that vendors may reject them.

Vendor
13

Prohibited AI Practices Declaration

All nine prohibited practices listed with their specific article reference, including the two new prohibitions that apply from December 2026.

Governance
14

Management AI Governance Review and Sign-Off

An eight-point management review with an open actions table. Says plainly that it records a review, and is not a statement of legal compliance.

Governance
15

Annual AI Governance Review Schedule

A twelve-task annual review plus the full key dates table, so the calendar lives inside the process rather than in someone's memory.

Governance
16

EU AI Act: A Plain-English Guide for SME Owners

Scope, provider versus deployer, how the Act sorts AI uses, what applies now, what is coming, the fines table, and five things to do first.

Reference
17

30 Questions SME Owners Ask

Direct answers on scope, CV screening, insurance pricing, translation, social content, vendor pushback, and what the Digital Omnibus actually changed.

Reference
Plus the Excel register workbook. Six working sheets covering AI inventory, training register, incident log, oversight register, vendor tracker and annual review. The Word versions of those registers are included too, for printing and signing.

What non-compliance actually costs

Published accurately, including the part most sales pages leave out.

Infringement Maximum Basis
Prohibited practices €35M or 7% of worldwide turnover Art. 99(3)
Most other operator obligations, including deployer duties and transparency €15M or 3% of worldwide turnover Art. 99(4)
Supplying incorrect or misleading information to authorities €7.5M or 1% of worldwide turnover Art. 99(5)
The part that matters for a small business. For most organisations the ceiling is whichever figure is higher. For SMEs and start-ups, Article 99(6) makes it whichever figure is lower. If you have seen a sales page waving €35 million at a ten-person company, it is quoting the wrong ceiling. These are also maximums, and authorities must weigh the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and the size of the organisation. The more practical risk for most SMEs is an order to stop using a system.

Who this is for

Organisations that use AI systems built by others. In the language of the Act, deployers.

🏢

SMEs using third-party AI

ChatGPT, Copilot, AI features in a CRM or HR platform, a website chatbot. There is no general size exemption.

⚖️

Professional services

Accountants, recruiters and consultants. Recruitment uses are among the most common Annex III exposures.

💼

HR and operations leads

Anyone who has been handed AI Act readiness alongside their day job and needs a defensible paper trail.

🛒

E-commerce and SaaS

Chatbots, recommendation engines and AI-assisted content, where transparency duties may already apply.

🌍

Non-EU businesses

Including UK companies, where the output of an AI system you use is used in the EU. The pack explains the actual test.

📊

Anyone facing a due diligence ask

Insurers, enterprise customers and investors are starting to ask. Documented governance is the answer.

Who this is not for

This pack is built for deployers. It is not designed for providers, meaning organisations that develop AI systems and place them on the market under their own name. If you have built your own AI tool on top of a model or API, you may be its provider for some purposes, and you will need more than this pack. Document 01 helps you check which you are. It also does not cover general-purpose AI model obligations, or sector-specific rules in healthcare, financial services or law enforcement.

How the checklist is built

Every item carries its basis, so you are never guessing whether something is a legal duty or a suggestion. This is a genuine extract from Section 2.

Section 2: AI inventory and screening

Seven items. Each is labelled LAW with its article, or GOOD PRACTICE, or CHECK where it depends on your facts.

Compile an inventory of every AI system in use, including AI features embedded in existing software.
GOOD PRACTICE
Screen every system against the Annex III high-risk use cases.
LAW: Art. 6(2), Annex III
Where an Annex III use might not be high-risk because the system only performs a narrow procedural or preparatory task, obtain the provider's written assessment. A system that profiles natural persons is always high-risk.
LAW: Art. 6(3)
Screen every system for the Article 50 transparency situations, covering chatbots, deepfakes, public-interest text, emotion recognition and biometric categorisation.
LAW: Art. 50
Review the inventory at least annually and whenever a tool is added or materially changes.
GOOD PRACTICE

47 items across 7 sections in the full checklist

Get the pack

One payment. Instant download. Licensed for internal use by your organisation.

Complete Set · Version 1.0

EU AI Act Readiness Pack for SMEs

€249
€499
One-time · No subscription
  • 17 editable Word documents
  • Excel workbook with 6 working register sheets
  • 47-item master readiness checklist, every item sourced
  • AI inventory and screening register with full Annex III table
  • Company AI usage policy and staff briefing notes
  • Six transparency notice templates, law and voluntary marked separately
  • High-risk assessment form and human oversight procedure
  • Vendor information request letter and five contract clauses
  • Prohibited practices declaration, all nine practices cited
  • Management sign-off and annual review schedule
  • Plain-English guide and 30-question reference
  • Law verified 11 September 2026
Download Instantly, €249

🔒 Secure checkout via Stripe · Instant access after payment
Digital download. All sales final.

Common questions

Answered the way the pack answers them, which is to say accurately rather than alarmingly.

If you are established or located in the EU, yes, whatever your size. If you are outside the EU, it applies where the output of an AI system you use is used in the EU. Selling to EU customers is not, on its own, the test. There is no general size exemption, though SMEs do benefit from some measures, including the lower fine ceilings under Article 99(6).

Yes, through the AI literacy duty in Article 4, which applies whatever tools you use. Transparency duties under Article 50 apply only in specific situations, such as publishing AI-generated text on matters of public interest without human editorial review, or publishing deepfakes. Using these tools to draft internal documents or ordinary emails does not, by itself, trigger Article 50. Any product telling you every AI-assisted email needs a label is overstating the law.

It may. The Act reaches deployers outside the EU where the output of the AI system is used in the EU. Having EU customers does not automatically put you in scope; it depends on how and where the AI output is used. The pack explains the test, but for a definitive answer on your facts you should take advice.

Disclosure is almost certainly needed, because the exemption only applies where it is obvious to a reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect person that they are dealing with AI, and a human-sounding persona makes that less obvious. But note where the duty sits: Article 50(1) is the provider's design duty. If a vendor supplied the chatbot, your job is to check the disclosure is switched on and has not been removed. If you built it yourself on a model or API, the duty may be yours.

Very likely high-risk. Analysing and filtering applications and evaluating candidates are listed in Annex III, point 4. The narrow exception in Article 6(3) rarely fits ranking or filtering, and never applies where the system profiles people. The deployer duties apply from 2 December 2027, not now. That is not a reason to wait, because the vendor information you need takes months to obtain, which is exactly what Documents 08, 09 and 11 are for.

Yes. The law was verified on 11 September 2026 against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, which entered into force on 27 July 2026. That amendment softened the Article 4 literacy duty, moved high-risk obligations to December 2027 and August 2028, gave providers of existing generative systems until December 2026 for machine-readable marking, added two new prohibitions, and extended certain SME measures to small mid-caps. Every document carries the verification date.

No. Provider compliance does not cover your own duties as a deployer, which include AI literacy, transparency where it applies, and for high-risk systems, oversight, logging and informing affected people. Document 11 gives you a written request grounded in the provider's Article 13 duty to supply instructions for use.

No, and the pack says so on every page. It is a general educational and operational resource. It is not legal advice, a legal opinion, a compliance certification, or a guarantee that any organisation complies with the Act. The Act applies differently depending on your role, system, use case, sector and location. For high-risk, regulated or uncertain situations, take advice from a suitably qualified lawyer or regulatory specialist.

Seventeen editable Word documents plus one Excel workbook containing six working register sheets for inventory, training, incidents, oversight, vendors and the annual review. The Word versions of those registers are included as well, for printing and signing. A complete PDF of the whole set is included for reading and reference.

Because this is a digital product delivered instantly and in full, all sales are final and no refunds are offered. The complete contents are listed on this page so you know exactly what you are buying. If you are unsure whether the pack fits your situation, particularly if you think you might be a provider rather than a deployer, email us before ordering and we will tell you honestly if it is not right for you.

Readiness you can evidence,
without overstating what the law asks.

Seventeen documents, an Excel register workbook, and a checklist that tells you the difference between a duty and a suggestion.

Get the Pack, €249

Instant download · Licensed for internal use by the purchasing organisation
Digital product. All sales final.

This toolkit is a general educational and operational resource. It is not legal advice, a legal opinion, a compliance certification, or a guarantee that any organisation complies with the EU AI Act. The Act and related guidance apply differently depending on your role, AI system, use case, sector and location, and the law may change. Verify the current law and adapt these materials to your circumstances. Take advice from a suitably qualified lawyer or regulatory specialist for high-risk, regulated or uncertain use cases.

Legal basis: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Law last verified 11 September 2026.
Licensed for internal use by the purchasing organisation only. Not for resale or redistribution. Digital product, all sales final.
© 2026 AI Act Ready · support@aiactready.com